LIGHT VINAIGRETTE DRESSING vs TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
LIGHT VINAIGRETTE DRESSING: 2
vs
TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 23.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT VINAIGRETTE DRESSING | TRADITIONAL CAESAR DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 933 MG | 1,100 MG |