LIGHT RANCH DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LIGHT RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 1
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 267 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fat | 23.3 g | 32.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT RANCH DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 1,071 MG |