LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING vs SPICY RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING: 3
vs
SPICY RANCH DRESSING: 0
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | SPICY RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 194 cal | 419 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 6.5 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 41.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | SPICY RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | SPICY RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,516 MG | 1,000 MG |