LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING vs LIGHT DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING: 2
vs
LIGHT DRESSING: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 194 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 10 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | LIGHT DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,516 MG | 867 MG |