LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING vs COLESLAW DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING: 5
vs
COLESLAW DRESSING: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 586 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 13.8 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 58.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT CAESAR DRESSING | COLESLAW DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,067 MG | 586 MG |