LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING vs MCCORMICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING wins in 3 out of 12 nutrient categories
LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING: 3
vs
MCCORMICK: 0
(9 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 233 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 13.3 g | 13.3 g | Tie |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 40 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LIGHT BUFFALO RANCH DRESSING | MCCORMICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 867 MG |