LEMON SOFT CANDY vs CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
LEMON SOFT CANDY: 1
vs
CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LEMON SOFT CANDY | CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 400 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Carbs | 100 g | 75 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LEMON SOFT CANDY | CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LEMON SOFT CANDY | CHOCOLATE COVERED CLASSIC MARSHMALLOW PUFFS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 50 MG |