LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z. vs BEEF RIB 103 TOMAHAWK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z. wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z.: 6
vs
BEEF RIB 103 TOMAHAWK: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z. | BEEF RIB 103 TOMAHAWK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 cal | 257 cal | |
| Protein | 22.3 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 5.4 g | 20.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z. | BEEF RIB 103 TOMAHAWK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | LAMB BLNS LEGS N.Z. | BEEF RIB 103 TOMAHAWK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 2 MG | 10 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 232 MG | 230 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 80 MG | 58 MG |