KROGER vs SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
KROGER: 0
vs
SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KROGER | SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 370 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.7 g | |
| Carbs | 95 g | 85.2 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KROGER | SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KROGER | SOUR APPLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |