KINGS vs MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
KINGS: 2
vs
MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | KINGS | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 516 cal | 464 cal | |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 64.5 g | 57.1 g | |
| Fat | 25.8 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | KINGS | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | KINGS | MACADAMIA WHITE CHOCOLATE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 196 MG |