JIM BEAM vs COOKED LARGE SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED LARGE SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
JIM BEAM: 3
vs
COOKED LARGE SHRIMP: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | JIM BEAM | COOKED LARGE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 275 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 16.2 g | 16.5 g | |
| Carbs | 4.2 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 6.3 g | 1.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | JIM BEAM | COOKED LARGE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | JIM BEAM | COOKED LARGE SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 14 MG | 47 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 570 MG | 329 MG |