ITALIAN DRESSING vs FUJI APPLE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
ITALIAN DRESSING: 6
vs
FUJI APPLE DRESSING: 0
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ITALIAN DRESSING | FUJI APPLE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 10 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ITALIAN DRESSING | FUJI APPLE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 8 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ITALIAN DRESSING | FUJI APPLE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,167 MG | 500 MG |