ICING vs WHITE BARK COATING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ICING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ICING: 4
vs
WHITE BARK COATING: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ICING | WHITE BARK COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 536 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 65.7 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ICING | WHITE BARK COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 0 MG |