ICED TEA vs ANDERSON ERICKSON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANDERSON ERICKSON wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
ICED TEA: 1
vs
ANDERSON ERICKSON: 2
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ICED TEA | ANDERSON ERICKSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1,000 cal | 25 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 237.5 g | 6.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ICED TEA | ANDERSON ERICKSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ICED TEA | ANDERSON ERICKSON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 0 MG |