HORMEL vs ELBOW FULLY COOKED 60 SECOND PASTA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HORMEL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
HORMEL: 5
vs
ELBOW FULLY COOKED 60 SECOND PASTA: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HORMEL | ELBOW FULLY COOKED 60 SECOND PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 85 cal | 220 cal | |
| Protein | 5.2 g | 7 g | |
| Carbs | 13.2 g | 40 g | |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HORMEL | ELBOW FULLY COOKED 60 SECOND PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HORMEL | ELBOW FULLY COOKED 60 SECOND PASTA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 9 MG | 8 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 465 MG | 340 MG |