HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM vs UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM: 3
vs
UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 357 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HOCKS OR BUTTS SLICED HAM | UNCURED SLOW COOKED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 7.1 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,946 MG | 857 MG |