HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT vs SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT: 7
vs
SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 67 cal | |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 1.1 g | |
| Carbs | 75 g | 15.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 10.7 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 42.9 MG | 13.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HIMALAYAN SUPERFRUIT | SQUEEZABLE FRUIT POUCH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 6.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 1,114 MG | 128 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 0 MG |