HATFIELD vs CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 9 out of 10 nutrient categories
HATFIELD: 0
vs
CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 9
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATFIELD | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 176 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 18.7 g | |
| Carbs | 5.4 g | 4.4 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 8.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATFIELD | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATFIELD | CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 88 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 802 MG |