HATFIELD vs MILD PORK SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD PORK SAUSAGE wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HATFIELD: 2
vs
MILD PORK SAUSAGE: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATFIELD | MILD PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 48.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATFIELD | MILD PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATFIELD | MILD PORK SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 732 MG | 839 MG |