HATFIELD vs FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HATFIELD: 1
vs
FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HATFIELD | FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 289 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 15.6 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 26.8 g | 22.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HATFIELD | FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HATFIELD | FULLY COOKED PORK SAUSAGE LINKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,107 MG | 644 MG |