HARRIS TEETER vs ORGANIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORGANIC DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARRIS TEETER: 2
vs
ORGANIC DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARRIS TEETER | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 233 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 43.3 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARRIS TEETER | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARRIS TEETER | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 333 MG |