HARD CIDER BRATWURST vs BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARD CIDER BRATWURST wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARD CIDER BRATWURST: 5
vs
BEEF FRANKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 cal | 283 cal | |
| Protein | 17.7 g | 11.3 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.2 g | 24.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARD CIDER BRATWURST | BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 588 MG | 906 MG |