HARD CANDY vs MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARD CANDY: 0
vs
MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARD CANDY | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 100 g | 82.1 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARD CANDY | MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 71 MG |