HARD CANDY vs MARSHMALLOW SWIRL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MARSHMALLOW SWIRL wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
HARD CANDY: 1
vs
MARSHMALLOW SWIRL: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HARD CANDY | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 412 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.8 g | |
| Carbs | 94.1 g | 81.0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 4.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HARD CANDY | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 17.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | HARD CANDY | MARSHMALLOW SWIRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |