HANNAFORD vs RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANNAFORD wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 5
vs
RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 429 cal | 433 cal | |
| Protein | 42.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HANNAFORD | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | RANCH PLANT-BASED DRESSING & DIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 2,000 MG | 567 MG |