HANNAFORD vs PUMPKIN PATCH DECORATIVE SANDING SUGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HANNAFORD wins in 4 out of 8 nutrient categories
HANNAFORD: 4
vs
PUMPKIN PATCH DECORATIVE SANDING SUGAR: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HANNAFORD | PUMPKIN PATCH DECORATIVE SANDING SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 375 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 50 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HANNAFORD | PUMPKIN PATCH DECORATIVE SANDING SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 36 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |