HAM vs SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAM: 2
vs
SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAM | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAM | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAM | SLOW COOKED CORNED BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 750 MG | 554 MG |