HAFCO vs S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
HAFCO: 1
vs
S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | HAFCO | S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.0 g | |
| Carbs | 93.8 g | 81.8 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | HAFCO | S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | HAFCO | S'MOREMALLOWS MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 125 MG | 106 MG |