GUMMY BEARS vs SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
GUMMY BEARS: 2
vs
SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GUMMY BEARS | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 5 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 67.5 g | 63.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GUMMY BEARS | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GUMMY BEARS | SNACKABLE MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 38 MG | 17 MG |