GUMMI SHARKS vs FRANKENSTEIN FINGER MARSHMALLOWS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GUMMI SHARKS wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
GUMMI SHARKS: 4
vs
FRANKENSTEIN FINGER MARSHMALLOWS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GUMMI SHARKS | FRANKENSTEIN FINGER MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 333 cal | 412 cal | |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 2.9 g | |
| Carbs | 78.6 g | 70.6 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 14.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GUMMI SHARKS | FRANKENSTEIN FINGER MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GUMMI SHARKS | FRANKENSTEIN FINGER MARSHMALLOWS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 65 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 36 MG | 29 MG |