GUMMI BEARS vs MARSHMALLOW POLE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GUMMI BEARS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
GUMMI BEARS: 5
vs
MARSHMALLOW POLE: 0
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GUMMI BEARS | MARSHMALLOW POLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 300 cal | 381 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 2.4 g | |
| Carbs | 70 g | 90.5 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GUMMI BEARS | MARSHMALLOW POLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GUMMI BEARS | MARSHMALLOW POLE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 33 MG | 0 MG |