GROUND LAMB vs GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
GROUND LAMB: 0
vs
GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST: 6
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND LAMB | GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 142 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 21.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 17.7 g | 6.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND LAMB | GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND LAMB | GRASS FED BEEF CHUCK ROAST | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 18 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 372 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 58 MG | 62 MG |