GROUND CHUCK BEEF vs MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
GROUND CHUCK BEEF: 3
vs
MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND CHUCK BEEF | MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 cal | 272 cal | |
| Protein | 17.0 g | 29.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.6 g | |
| Fat | 20.5 g | 13.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GROUND CHUCK BEEF | MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND CHUCK BEEF | MEATLESS KIELBASA PLANT BASED SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 141 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 543 MG |