GROUND BEEF vs WILD CAUGHT CHIPOTLE SALMON BURGER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
GROUND BEEF: 4
vs
WILD CAUGHT CHIPOTLE SALMON BURGER: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GROUND BEEF | WILD CAUGHT CHIPOTLE SALMON BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 257 cal | 133 cal | |
| Protein | 16.8 g | 14.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20.4 g | 8.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GROUND BEEF | WILD CAUGHT CHIPOTLE SALMON BURGER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.0 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 274 MG | 221 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 66 MG | 407 MG |