GRILL FRANKS vs SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRILL FRANKS wins in 2 out of 10 nutrient categories
GRILL FRANKS: 2
vs
SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS: 1
(7 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRILL FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 304 cal | 304 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 28.6 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRILL FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRILL FRANKS | SKINLESS BUN LENGTH BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.3 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,054 MG | 1,143 MG |