GREEN DECORATING ICING vs ARTISANAL CANE SUGAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ARTISANAL CANE SUGAR wins in 8 out of 13 nutrient categories
GREEN DECORATING ICING: 2
vs
ARTISANAL CANE SUGAR: 8
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GREEN DECORATING ICING | ARTISANAL CANE SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 417 cal | 360 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 80 g | |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GREEN DECORATING ICING | ARTISANAL CANE SUGAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 800 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 7.2 MG | |
| Magnesium, Mg | 0 MG | 640 MG | |
| Manganese, Mn | 0 MG | 10 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 300 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 0 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 0 MG | 18 MG |