GREAT VALUE vs SWEET TAMARIND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET TAMARIND wins in 7 out of 11 nutrient categories
GREAT VALUE: 2
vs
SWEET TAMARIND: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GREAT VALUE | SWEET TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GREAT VALUE | SWEET TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 10.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | GREAT VALUE | SWEET TAMARIND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 157 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.6 MG | 2.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,357 MG | 0 MG |