GRATED TOPPING vs PINK DECORATING ICING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GRATED TOPPING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
GRATED TOPPING: 4
vs
PINK DECORATING ICING: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GRATED TOPPING | PINK DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 60 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 17.1 g | |
| Fiber | 20 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GRATED TOPPING | PINK DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GRATED TOPPING | PINK DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 29 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,600 MG | 29 MG |