GLITTER ICING vs BARK COATING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
GLITTER ICING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
GLITTER ICING: 4
vs
BARK COATING: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GLITTER ICING | BARK COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 526 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Carbs | 60 g | 68.4 g | |
| Fat | 20 g | 28.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GLITTER ICING | BARK COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GLITTER ICING | BARK COATING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 100 MG | 0 MG |