GENOA SALAMI vs ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
GENOA SALAMI: 3
vs
ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GENOA SALAMI | ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 320 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GENOA SALAMI | ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GENOA SALAMI | ORIGINAL UNCURED ANGUS BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 680 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,607 MG | 980 MG |