GENOA SALAME vs SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
GENOA SALAME: 4
vs
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | GENOA SALAME | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 286 cal | 109 cal | |
| Protein | 25 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 3.6 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | GENOA SALAME | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 42.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | GENOA SALAME | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 356 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,643 MG | 800 MG |