FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE vs BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE: 6
vs
BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 cal | 298 cal | |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 10.5 g | |
| Carbs | 5.3 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 9.7 g | 26.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 3.2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK SAUSAGE | BEEF BUN LENGTH FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 867 MG | 912 MG |