FULLY COOKED HOT LINK vs UNCURED BEEF FRANKS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FULLY COOKED HOT LINK wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED HOT LINK: 5
vs
UNCURED BEEF FRANKS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 287 cal | 320 cal | |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 14.7 g | |
| Carbs | 7.5 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 25.5 g | 26.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED BEEF FRANKS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 64 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 968 MG | 987 MG |