FULLY COOKED HOT LINK vs UNCURED KIELBASA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCURED KIELBASA wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
FULLY COOKED HOT LINK: 4
vs
UNCURED KIELBASA: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 287 cal | 179 cal | |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 7.5 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fat | 25.5 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FULLY COOKED HOT LINK | UNCURED KIELBASA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 64 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 262 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 968 MG | 732 MG |