FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) vs RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.): 2
vs
RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.1 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FROZEN SNAPPER PORTION (LUTJANUS SPP.) | RAW EXTRA LARGE ARGENTINE RED WILD SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 291 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 71 MG | 230 MG |