FLOUNDER vs MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FLOUNDER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
FLOUNDER: 4
vs
MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP: 2
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FLOUNDER | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 0 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FLOUNDER | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FLOUNDER | MEDIUM COOKED SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 459 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 141 MG | 0 MG |