FISHLESS TUNA vs WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
FISHLESS TUNA: 2
vs
WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FISHLESS TUNA | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 86 cal | |
| Protein | 16.3 g | 14.3 g | |
| Carbs | 11.6 g | 5.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FISHLESS TUNA | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FISHLESS TUNA | WILD CAUGHT SALMON SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 93 MG | 99 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 326 MG | 829 MG |