FILLED MARSHMALLOWS vs RUNTS CANDY
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FILLED MARSHMALLOWS wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
FILLED MARSHMALLOWS: 6
vs
RUNTS CANDY: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | RUNTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 405 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 67.6 g | 93.3 g | |
| Fat | 13.5 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | RUNTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FILLED MARSHMALLOWS | RUNTS CANDY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.1 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 108 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 41 MG | 0 MG |