FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING vs TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING: 2
vs
TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 267 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 20 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 23.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | TRADITIONAL ITALIAN DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 1,133 MG |