FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING vs BACON RANCH DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON RANCH DRESSING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING: 2
vs
BACON RANCH DRESSING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 83 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 3.3 g | |
| Carbs | 20 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | FIG BALSAMIC DRESSING | BACON RANCH DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 767 MG | 900 MG |